premium blogad:

blogads:

advertisement:

sitemeter:

October 24, 2008
  
Link Dump: October 24th, 2008

Links to come.


847 Responses to “Link Dump: October 24th, 2008”

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]

    Gravatar
  1. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 4:53 pm (#884088)

    They should have the right, just as you or I do, to make stand on an issue that they feel is something they support.

    They have a right to make a stand. Don’t give the anti-Prop 8 guys money and see what becomes of it.

    I agree it is a bullshit way of doing business, but it is 100% legal.

    Besides, I can argue to you that these companies put themselves at risk of protest by giving their money in the first place — if they didn’t want the hassle, they shouldn’t have donated to the Yes on Prop 8 folks.

  2. Comment posted by sheadenizen on October 24, 2008 at 4:56 pm (#884089)

    Where does the right to privacy enter into this discussion?

  3. Comment posted by DoctorK16 on October 24, 2008 at 4:56 pm (#884090)

    Really a well run corporation has no interests except the shareholders, employees and customers. They dabble enough to get what they need from the political system and leave it alone. They are nihilistic in nature. They don’t social issues with 25 foot pole.

  4. Gravatar
  5. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 4:57 pm (#884091)

    Not for blackmail: the truth is not an affirmative defense for blackmail at all. As a lawyer you should not confuse slander/libel with blackmail. The two are different.

    What they are doing is not blackmail.

    Technically, blackmail would be demanding money to avoid turning someone in for illegal activities.

    What they are doing is saying if you do not give an equal donation to us, we are going to tell everyone that you are pro gay marriage.

    This is a 100% true statement. Moreover, under California law, donor records are public; so they are not threatening to divulge any secret information.

    Is is a form of blackmail? Sure. Is there any criminal, civil, or common law violation? None whatsoever.

  6. Gravatar
  7. Comment posted by Hockey Season in St. Louis on October 24, 2008 at 4:58 pm (#884092)

    I hope Palin gets speared in the thorax tonight dropping the puck…

  8. Comment posted by DoctorK16 on October 24, 2008 at 4:58 pm (#884093)

    Corporate entities by nature don’t have privacy. They are owned by entities of the public and have to account for their spending to those entities so they have zero privacy.

  9. Comment posted by Athena on October 24, 2008 at 4:58 pm (#884094)

    athena, you got any fun plans this weekendy? Endy!

    Yup! Big date to celebrate the birthday of one of my favorite young men.

    He turned 9 last week. So there will be homemade chocolate cake, Wii and WiiFit and assorted activities.

    And I think that I’m going to buy him a kit to build his own robot as one of his gifts. Which will mean that I am assembling a robot this weekend. Auntie Athena is in charge of all assembly and technology issues in the family! Auntie Artemis bakes the cakes. ;-)

  10. Gravatar
  11. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 4:58 pm (#884095)

    You can’t complain about boycotts and then pull this shit Lew, that’s what really pisses me off.

    And they have been lying left and right about what Prop 8 does. I think if you are running support for a Prop and arguing morality…lying isn’t the way to do it.

    Last time I checked the Bible has something specifically about lying, but nothing about gay marriage.

  12. Comment posted by sheadenizen on October 24, 2008 at 4:59 pm (#884096)

    I’m sure her children will be in attendance. it’s official business, right ;-)

  13. Gravatar
  14. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 4:59 pm (#884097)

    Where does the right to privacy enter into this discussion?

    Under California Laws, all donors to polictical campaigns and causes are a matter of public record.

    Once you give a cause/person your money, you lose any right to privacy.

    Believe it or not this law was passed to protect the electorate from huge contributions from corporations/PACs — it seems what it has done is leave people vunerable to these exact threats.

  15. Gravatar
  16. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:00 pm (#884098)

    You can’t complain about boycotts and then pull this shit Lew, that’s what really pisses me off.

    I agree, but hypocrispy is not illegal — if it was all 535 members of Congress, most of the executive branch and our two candidates for President would all be in jail!

  17. Gravatar
  18. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:02 pm (#884099)

    Yup! Big date to celebrate the birthday of one of my favorite young men.

    He turned 9 last week. So there will be homemade chocolate cake, Wii and WiiFit and assorted activities.

    dawwwwww yay! that sounds soooo cute :) have so much fun! sounds like my kinda party!

    And I think that I’m going to buy him a kit to build his own robot as one of his gifts. Which will mean that I am assembling a robot this weekend. Auntie Athena is in charge of all assembly and technology issues in the family! Auntie Artemis bakes the cakes. ;-)

    hahahahaha, that is awesome. great gift!

  19. Gravatar
  20. Comment posted by Hockey Season in St. Louis on October 24, 2008 at 5:02 pm (#884100)

    I will wager to say she gets booed with a smattering of applause.

  21. Gravatar
  22. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:02 pm (#884101)

    if the donation records are public, then that’s it.

    its not blackmail. its public information.

  23. Gravatar
  24. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:03 pm (#884102)

    Corporate entities by nature don’t have privacy.

    Are you talking S-Corps or C-Corps? Or even LLCs? There is different levels of privacy related to each.

    I would guess that the companies that own individual hotels are LLCs, which means they are totally privately owned and not subject to public scrutiny.

  25. Gravatar
  26. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:03 pm (#884103)

    LLCs are where its at

    we’re an LLC :)

  27. Gravatar
  28. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:05 pm (#884104)

    if the donation records are public, then that’s it.

    its not blackmail. its public information

    They are. I worked on a case suing a (stand-by now) Republican group in California that refused to provide a list of its out-of-state donors for public review.

    They lost.

    The whole purpose of the law is to put pressure on companies and individuals who support unpopular causes.

    It was supported by the CA democratic party — it is now being used against a cause they support.

    Politics is funny that way

  29. Gravatar
  30. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:05 pm (#884105)

    Laveranues Coles (head, thigh) is listed as probable for Week 8. Jerricho Cotchery (shoulder) is questionable.
    Coles’ listing comes as a surprise after coach Eric Mangini revealed Thursday that Laveranues is coming off a concussion and he didn’t practice Wednesday or Thursday. Coles can be plugged into lineups against an inexperienced Chiefs secondary. He will likely square off against rookie RCB Brandon Flowers. Cotchery, as expected, will be a game-day decision. Oct. 24 - 4:41 pm et

  31. Comment posted by Athena on October 24, 2008 at 5:05 pm (#884106)

    sounds like my kinda party!

    hahahaha! It is!!! Great food, beer and wine, loads of superhero cartoons (my sister is fond of them), non-stop video games, and lots of toys that require batteries. You’d have a great time. Want to attend? Nobody smokes, so there is no temptation. ;-)

  32. Gravatar
  33. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:06 pm (#884107)

    politiks b craaaaaazy

  34. Gravatar
  35. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:06 pm (#884108)

    LLCs are where its at

    Fuck yeah it is — I own two, neither is worth a hill of beans, but I do own them!

  36. Gravatar
  37. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:06 pm (#884109)

    hahahaha! It is!!! Great food, beer and wine, loads of superhero cartoons (my sister is fond of them), non-stop video games, and lots of toys that require batteries. You’d have a great time. Want to attend? Nobody smokes, so there is no temptation. ;-)

    hahahahahahahah, that’s totally my scene! i think i may wanna go!!! maybe next year! :)

  38. Gravatar
  39. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:06 pm (#884110)

    Fuck yeah it is — I own two, neither is worth a hill of beans, but I do own them!

    hahahahaa nice yo

  40. Comment posted by DoctorK16 on October 24, 2008 at 5:07 pm (#884111)

    Are you talking S-Corps or C-Corps? Or even LLCs? There is different levels of privacy related to each.

    I would guess that the companies that own individual hotels are LLCs, which means they are totally privately owned and not subject to public scrutiny.

    I had the common stock issuing companies in mind. I’m just an engineer so I don’t get down with all the legalese.

  41. Gravatar
  42. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:07 pm (#884112)

    If Coles plays against the Chiefs he is a complete fucking idiot.

    Why would he risk his long term health in any game, let alone one against the shittiest team in the NFL?

  43. Gravatar
  44. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 5:07 pm (#884113)

    Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:02 pm (#884101)

    if the donation records are public, then that’s it.

    its not blackmail. its public information.

    Lew even admits its blackmail, just not legal blackmail. It’s the tone of the article. Someone can commit blackmail and not realize the information is known to the public.

    GIVE US WHAT WE WANT OR ELSE. Even if the else is something everyone knows. And I never said hypocrisy wasn’t legal, but it’s immoral behavior. I’m finding people running on moral values campaigns better be moral people themselves. I don’t find that to be an unfair request.

    They’re lying and saying gay marriage will be taught in schools because it happens in Mass. Mass people are crazy, why lump us in with them?

  45. Gravatar
  46. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:08 pm (#884114)

    I figured Doc, my point was that there are alot of large non-public companies out there, and they are not subject to the regulations you are talking about

  47. Gravatar
  48. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 5:08 pm (#884115)

    Oh, they also lied when first questioned about the letter. Then admitted they sent it out.

  49. Comment posted by DoctorK16 on October 24, 2008 at 5:10 pm (#884116)

    I figured Doc, my point was that there are alot of large non-public companies out there, and they are not subject to the regulations you are talking about

    Yeah I know. I worked for one until 2 months ago. They were fully owned by a hedge fund.

  50. Comment posted by Athena on October 24, 2008 at 5:10 pm (#884117)

    hahahahahahahah, that’s totally my scene! i think i may wanna go!!! maybe next year! :)

    Anytime!! That description applies to almost every family event!

  51. Comment posted by bcuster on October 24, 2008 at 5:11 pm (#884118)

    anybody see pj around lately? my team (irish) is playing his team (redHawks) in hockey tonight & tomorrow. we used to have a friendly little rivalry going…

  52. Comment posted by Athena on October 24, 2008 at 5:12 pm (#884119)

    anybody see pj around lately? my team (irish) is playing his team (redHawks) in hockey tonight & tomorrow. we used to have a friendly little rivalry going…

    Isn’t pj getting married today? Or is that next Friday?

  53. Gravatar
  54. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:12 pm (#884120)

    My whole point future is that what they are doing is not illegal — immoral is another story.

    What I funny funny is that it is totally legal, in part because of the actions of the party that is supporting Prop 8.

    That is some delightful irony!

    The CA dems pushed that through after Prop 209 passed — they were pissed that the Republicans were able to raise the money they needed to support that Prop.

    They knew full well at the time that this law would be used to turn on folks who support certain political causes — they just didn’t care because they figured, it being California and all, that it would be used against conservative groups/individuals — so, with that backdrop, I find it fucking hilarious that a conservative group is using it to their advantage.

  55. Comment posted by sheadenizen on October 24, 2008 at 5:13 pm (#884121)

    custer, pj is getting married this weekend. Not sure he’s worried about hockey right now….but hey, you never know ;-)

  56. Comment posted by bcuster on October 24, 2008 at 5:15 pm (#884122)

    Isn’t pj getting married today?

    he’s getting married this weekend? he should be center ice in south bend. that man has his priorities all mixed up…

  57. Comment posted by Athena on October 24, 2008 at 5:17 pm (#884123)

    I’m out, geeks! Hope you all have a great weekend.

  58. Comment posted by bcuster on October 24, 2008 at 5:18 pm (#884124)

    well, maybe he failed to check the schedule when he booked his nuptial. congratulations, pj wherever you are!

    you probably wouldn’t have wanted to watch anyway; fighting irish are gonna kick birdie ass..

  59. Gravatar
  60. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 5:19 pm (#884125)

    On the Prop 8 thing the majority of the Yes people are out of state funders. Can CA erect a law that prevent out of state contributions for state propositions?

  61. Gravatar
  62. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:25 pm (#884126)

    hehehehe erect hehehehehe

  63. Gravatar
  64. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 5:25 pm (#884127)

    You want to see me erect Dep? I thought you were into men that said neigh.

  65. Gravatar
  66. Comment posted by Dep on October 24, 2008 at 5:27 pm (#884128)

    You want to see me erect Dep? I thought you were into men that said neigh.

    LOL! stop it!

    that’s off the geek talk, you know that! ;)

  67. Gravatar
  68. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 5:33 pm (#884129)

    Smoke this doobie. Hey yo!

  69. Gravatar
  70. Comment posted by sweetlew on October 24, 2008 at 5:55 pm (#884130)

    Dep, you are a child! (and I love you for it!)

    They aren’t ERECTING barriers — just making donors public — that was the focal point of the defendants that we went against, they didn’t have to list out of state donors. They lost.

    Alright all….have a good weekend I am going to make like a tree and take off!

    GO RAYS!!!!!!

  71. Comment posted by bcuster on October 24, 2008 at 6:03 pm (#884131)

    GO RAYS!

    GO IRISH!

  72. Gravatar
  73. Comment posted by TLC on October 24, 2008 at 6:57 pm (#884132)

    Saying hi again. Once again, I’m on when no one else is on

  74. Gravatar
  75. Comment posted by Future, now with a present J.D. on October 24, 2008 at 8:11 pm (#884134)

    I’m here, Chris. What up?

  76. Gravatar
  77. Comment posted by 86Forever on October 24, 2008 at 9:23 pm (#884136)

    Quiet, everyone.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

advertisement:

advertisement:

-->

rss/syndication:

your ad here:

advertisement: