Last night I was listening to Steve Sommers on WFAN on my way to the gym. I’ve never called into the FAN, but I wanted to in this instance. Steve was going on and on about how fans should boo when they do not see “effort” or the players look like they don’t “care”. I need someone to explain to me how we are supposed to know if players care.
Do we want a team full of Paul O’Neill’s, who would throw bats and break water coolers after every out? Do we want guys to say something to the media? What exactly would it take to show these fans that the players care?
Seriously, do fans really think these guys are happy that they are slumping? Do we really think Carlos Beltran is thinking to himself “Oh, I’m getting $18 million, I don’t care if I strand runners”? Or that Carlos Delgado, by all accounts a prideful man, is happy that he is below the Mendoza line?
Fans are playing amateur psychologist here. They seem to think that since the team isn’t blowing out everyone they play that they do not care. Yes, I realize that I am doing the same thing. Tell me, if I am wrong to do it, doesn’t that mean the fans are as well?
I understand the desire to boo after a bad inning. My problem is when guys are booed as they step to the plate (Delgado), or come in from the bullpen (Heilman). In the case of Heilman, the guy is a notorious slow starter who has come through for the Mets a heck of a lot more times than he has hurt us. I know, he has blown some key games last year and this, but can’t we all remember that EVERY relief pitcher does the same? As for Delgado, the guy gets booed as he comes to the plate, then hits a home run and people get annoyed because he doesn’t take a curtain call. I wonder how many of those same people had problems with players celebrating in blow-out wins? Players aren’t slumping do to lack of effort. We don’t have anyone proclaiming they are in “Operation Shutdown.” We have a bunch of players who are slumping. It is that simple.
Later, I turned on SNY to hear John Heyman wax poetic about the Phillies energy, despite missing Shane Victorino and Jimmy Rollins. Heyman felt that the fact that the Phillies were playing so well despite missing those two players spoke well for them. He then proceeded to say the Mets don’t play with energy. I’m sorry, what exactly is “playing with energy”? Is it dugout celebrations by Reyes, which many media members wrote showed up other teams and led to losses (see Marlins, Floridain last game of last season)? Is it winning? Well, the Mets, despite missing key pieces of their own were 2 games over 500 going into last nights game, and were 1.5 games back. The last time I checked, divisions were not won in April. Heck, not even late September with a 7 game lead and 17 to play.
It seems that the media likes to find “reasons” for struggling teams, playing amateur psychologist to do so. We hear about lack of chemistry or energy when teams are not meeting expectations, and hear the opposite when they are winning. A portion of the fanbase reads these stories and takes them to heart. They read that the team is going to dominate, and then boo when it does not happen.
Willie is right. The fans and the media need to move past last season. The team is struggling right now. The middle of the lineup is hitting terribly. Some are ready to bury some of the guys. Not me. I remember last year when David Wright had an awful April, yet wound up with numbers that put him in the running for MVP. Soon, Wright and Beltran will heat up. Reyes too. They have too much talent to slump for much longer. At that point, we will all read about how much “energy” the Mets are playing with. And I will laugh. I went to games in the late 70’s and early 80’s, when this team REALLY sucked. I don’t remember the booing to be as bad then as it was now. There is such a thing as homefield advantage. Shea Stadium is a great place to play when the fans are supporting their team. On an unconscious level, the players can feed off the energy the fans provide. That energy is missing today. That energy is needed. You want the players to show energy, do the same thing. Show some POSITIVE energy.
Nice journal, Ed.
You answered your own question.
Winning = Energy
Losing = Lackadaisical and Passionless play
It’s a joke. What happened to the notion of cheering your own team, coaxing your guys through slumps with support, and booing the other team? I will just never understand booing your own team.
Don’t forget chemistry. By September we will have “great chemistry”.
I think teams that appear to have energy are those on the upswing. Right now many folks see the Mets on the tightrope between upswing and downswing. Those that see the latter see a lack of energy. They’re not right, but I’d guess that’s what people really mean when they say “energy.”
This comment isn’t aimed so much at this season, since they’ve been brutal so far.
But looking back over the past 2 years, I think this team has demonstrated a lack of effort and intensity. Delgado himself admitted as much in late 2007, saying they were bored. Mostly I attribute it to Willie’s dumb “just win series” philosophy and his assumption that a Joe Torre even keel stoic approach would work with any group of players (which it won’t unless those players are self-motivating, which many are not). This team seems to have internalized Willie’s philosophy to mean its ok to lose sometimes. These guys have been bad at sweeping other teams. They come out like gangbusters in game 1 of series and if they win that one they ease back in game 2. If they win games 1 and 2 of a 3 game series, it’s sleepy time in game 3. They take no pleasure in beating their opponents, unlike the Yankees of the past who loved to demolish everybody and the Braves, who love to beat up on the Mets and stick it to Mets fans. There’s a reason why this team gets so lopsidedly demolished by their chief rivals — it’s because their rivals get up for those games and the Mets don’t. Aside from Wright, Wagner and, previously, Lo Duca, there hasn’t been a lot of competitive fire or pride. The principal emotion displayed by this team has seemed to be aimless “joy,” which can be infectious when the team is winning, but it doesn’t seem to help to get them through rough patches, since it’s keyed more on the fun of being a millionaire ballplayer (which exists whether you’re winning or losing) than the fun of winning.