premium blogad:

blogads:

advertisement:

sitemeter:

January 30, 2008
  
Can’t Spell Santana Without Santa…

Today the Mets acquired Johan Santana. I decided early on that I was going to delay talking about Santana until he was officially a Met… I didn’t want to get my hopes up only to have them crushed yet again.

But now we have him. It’s a small miracle. Pending the physical and contract extension (which, knowing the Mets, might be more of an obstacle than we think) well have obtained Johan for a package of four prospects. I’ll take another look at those prospects in another post.

What I want to do here is take a look at Santana. We all know he’s good. Sure, he’s great. But just how good is he?

Santana

Career: 93-44 record (.679 win pct)
1308 2/3 IP
3.22 ERA
1.094 WHIP

Two Cy Young Awards, one third place finish, one fifth, and one seventh.

His career had a slow start, as for some reason the Twins were very conservative with him at the beginning. He made the majors in 2000 at the age of 21, then had an even shorter stint in 2001 before logging some major innings in 2002. In ‘02 he started 14 games and relieved in 13, posting great numbers: 2.99 ERA and 1.22 WHIP and about 11 k/9.

He wasn’t in the rotation to start the year in 2003 either - logging only 158 innings in 18 starts and 27 relief appearances. This may have been an accidental blessing. By the end of his age 24 year, he had only logged 342 minor league and less than 400 major league innings in his six years as a pro. The innings had increased to 160 when he was 20, before the Twins brought him up and mixed him in as a reliever and spot starter in 2000-2003.

Santana’s Value to the Mets
In 2004, he became JOHAN! for real. It was the first season in a four year stretch (dating to today) where he posted at least 219 innings and an ERA of 3.33 or lower. In those four years, he has struck out 265, 238, 245, and 238 batters. In their history, the Mets have only had 22 seasons where a pitcher has struck out 200 batters or more. They have had ten seasons where a player struck out 230 or more, the vast majority of which came back when pitchers - such as Seaver - pitched nearly 300 innings.

To narrow it down even further, the Mets have only had FOUR seasons where a starter has managed to strike out more than 9.5 batters per nine innings… and that is Santana’s career AVERAGE. Yeah. Think Dwight Gooden. Think Tom Seaver.

Strikeouts don’t win games though - preventing runners and preventing runs do. This is the last stat I’m going to bore you with. Over the last four years, Johan Santana has posted the following WHIP averages (walks plus hits divided by innings pitched - basically, the average # of runners they allow per inning):

2004: 0.92
2005: 0.97
2006: 1.00
2007: 1.07

Over the course of their history, Mets starters have only had SIX seasons where a pitcher has allowed a WHIP of 1.00 or less. Santana has already done it three times in the explosive American League. Speaking of which, Pedro had one of those seasons back in 2005.

Statistical Nuggets
Nate Silver projects Santana to have a 2.98 ERA and strike out 239 hitters next season. (Keep in mind that these computer projections are always somewhat conservative - there is a regression to the mean evident in all of them. The stars are likely to exceed the stats projected simply because there are so few players like them.)
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=738

These are Santana’s career inter-league stats: 182.2 IP, 16-4, 191 K, 2.27 ERA, 0.91 WHIP.

Overall
We know Santana is good. But how good is he? Well, to put it gently… he’s entering his age 29 season. He’s won two of the last four AL Cy Youngs. He’s first in strikeouts and wins in the last four seasons, and there are no signs of let up. He has good natural stuff. He knows how to pitch. He’s athletic, had limited innings when he was younger, and handled this whole trade situation with tact and aplomb. His most conservative projections have him at a 2.98 ERA.

I think Santana is going to come here and post approximately a 2.70 ERA. Shea is a pitcher’s park, and so are the parks in Atlanta and Florida. Philadelphia plays in a bandbox and we’re not sure yet about the new Washington stadium… but overall, park factors should play a slight factor.

He is exactly the kind of acquisition that transforms your franchise. A dominant ace - the best pitcher in baseball - changes EVERYTHING.

#3 Oliver Perez, 3.56 ERA in 2007
#4 John Maine, 3.91 ERA
#5 Orlando Hernandez, 3.72 ERA

That rotation, fronted by Pedro and Santana, can be historically good. Aside from El Duque, none of these pitchers project to be an above-average injury risk. By getting Santana, each of these guys slides down a slot and the only weakness, the #5 spot, is now occupied by Santana instead of Mike Pelfrey or some other unknown quantity.

This isn’t some blind homerism - Santana could win 20 games. With the Mets offense, Santana could win even more than that. He instantly becomes the front runner for the Cy Young award, and is going to be in the prime of his career for the next five years. The future is bright indeed.

Post-Script
I think it’s worth noting, procedurally speaking, that this was the perfect storm for the Mets to make this acquisition.  For some reason, aside from BOS and NYY, no other teams were particularly interested… and I can’t figure why.  If I was a fan of LAD or another team with money, I would be livid right now that the Mets got Santana for as little as they did.  But- that’s not our problem. 

With the Yankees and Red Sox only bidding to keep each other out of it, and with the Twins set to lose Santana at the end of the season anyway, their smartest move was to deal him for the best package possible.  I feel bad for the Twinkies - but I think that a few of these guys, particularly Deolis Guerra, have a great future ahead of them. 

Time will tell where this trade ends up, but from where I sit, this is the best acquisition the Mets have made in the last 20 years.  Pedro was past his prime, Beltran was great but slightly overrated, Alomar was ready for his decline phase, etc.  Once again, this is the perfect confuence of factors - a young, healthy, impact player… and this time, the best of his kind.  The Piazza deal comes close, but pitching wins championships.  Those guys were all great, but nothing tops this.  Let’s Go Mets.


7 Responses to “Can’t Spell Santana Without Santa…”

  1. Comment posted by Jose Reyes - RBI Machine on January 30, 2008 at 2:30 am (#599612)

    Couple things. Sorry the formatting sucks. Not a very controversial scribble, but comments welcome.

  2. Gravatar
  3. Comment posted by MetsFanSince71 on January 30, 2008 at 8:41 am (#599631)

    He is exactly the kind of acquisition that transforms your franchise. A dominant ace - the best pitcher in baseball - changes EVERYTHING.

    That sentence says it all.

    Nice journal, JRRM!

  4. Gravatar
  5. Comment posted by dptydwg420 on January 30, 2008 at 10:48 am (#599931)

    Johan gave the twins 3 teams he would accept a trade to. NYM, NYY and BoSox

    That’s why no one else was interested, Johan wouldnt go there. I guess the Twins could have tried to pry offers and let the team convince him to go there, but I guess the looming contract extension required along with Johan’s hesitance to go to other teams outside of those 3, kept them all out of it.

    We got lucky and have a great GM. We were due for something good imo.

  6. Comment posted by Ed in Westchester 2.0 on January 30, 2008 at 10:50 am (#599937)

    Good stuff JRRM.

  7. Comment posted by Bangkok Mets Fan on February 2, 2008 at 3:18 am (#603882)

    Best day for the Mets since they got Keith Hernandez

  8. Comment posted by Jerry from Queens on February 2, 2008 at 11:10 am (#603900)

    The reason only the BoSox, Yanks, and Mets were interested is they are the only teams that could afford Santana. $150M is a huge financial commitment, and I am glad my team is one of the top payroll teams in baseball.

  9. Comment posted by Wdwrkr35 on February 3, 2008 at 2:58 pm (#604310)

    I think a few of the predicting sites gave a higher ERA then 2.99 for santana.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

advertisement:

advertisement:

-->

rss/syndication:

your ad here:

advertisement: