premium blogad:

blogads:

advertisement:

sitemeter:

July 3, 2006
  
Mets By The Numbers
by: Eric Simon on Jul 3, 2006 12:31 PM | Filed under: Articles

No, I’m not talking about the greatest website ever dedicated to Mets uniform numerology. Over at my blog, I post statistical previews of each of the Mets’ opponents, normally the morning of the first game of the series. It’s basically a snapshot of the team and its players and how they’ve been doing this season, and it serves as a refresher (or sometimes an introduction) to the opposing team and their performance to date.

Since I started doing these breakdowns of the Mets’ opponents, I’ve had countless requests (okay, two requests) to post a similar report for the Mets. Seeing as we are at the true halfway point in the season and it’s Independence Monday and a lot of you aren’t around anyway, I’ve decided to run the numbers for our favorite team.

Record

NL EAST           W   L   PCT   GB    HOME   ROAD   RS   RA
NY Mets          48  33  .593   --    22-15  26-18  424  363
Philadelphia     37  44  .457  11.0  18-23  19-21  392  430
Florida          35  43  .449  11.5  18-20  17-23  360  359
Atlanta          35  47  .427  13.5  16-21  19-26  392  415
Washington       35  48  .422  14.0  17-20  18-28  362  422

 W    L     RS     RA     W1     L1     W2     L2     W3     L3
48   33    424    363    46.5   34.5   47.5   33.5   46.8   34.2

W1 and L1 are the expected wins and losses based on runs scored and runs allowed.
W2 and L2 are the expected wins and losses based on BP’s equivalence runs scored and allowed.
W3 and L3 are similar to W2 and L2 but adjusted for strength of schedule.

The Mets have played slightly better than their expected record. At its most granular application, Baseball Prospectus figures the Mets to be roughly a 47-34 team, just a shade worse than their actual 48-33 record. The team’s real record is what matters the most, though a significant disparity between expectation and reality is often a good indicator of future performance.

Starting Rotation

                    W   L    ERA     IP     H/9    SO/9   BB/9   HR/9   VORP
Pedro Martinez      7   4   3.45    101.2   6.55   9.83   2.48   1.24   24.2
Tom Glavine        11   2   3.34    107.2   8.44   6.27   2.76   1.25   30.7
Steve Trachsel      7   4   4.70     90.0  10.10   4.20   4.00   1.20   11.8
Orlando Hernandez   4   8   4.89     38.2   9.08   6.98   2.79   1.40    5.2
Alay Soler          2   3   6.00     45.0  10.00   4.60   4.20   1.40  (-2.6)

() parentheses denote negative numbers
italics denote left-handed pitchers

Pedro and Glavine have been terrific in the first half and were rewarded by Astros’ manager Phil Garner with selections to the All Star team. Trachsel has been passably effective, and Hernandez and Soler, apart from the occasional gem, have been erratic at best and abysmal at worst.

WPA Top Two
Tom Glavine, 186.0% WPA
Pedro Martinez, 161.9% WPA

WPA Bottom Two
Jose Lima, -77.0% WPA
Jeremi Gonzalez, -23.3% WPA

Starting Lineup

                    Pos   PA    AVG    OBP    SLG   SB  CS   VORP   NL Rank
Paul Lo Duca        C    283   .288   .329   .400    3   0    6.2    11/25
Carlos Delgado*     1B   333   .259   .342   .531    0   0   14.8     7/21
Jose Valentin#      2B   176   .287   .329   .525    2   2   10.5    10/22
Jose Reyes#         SS   382   .291   .349   .477   34   9   29.5     1/19
David Wright        3B   356   .324   .393   .580   11   3   36.3     2/19
Cliff Floyd*        LF   217   .233   .323   .392    4   0  (-0.7)   18/21
Carlos Beltran#     CF   315   .293   .400   .639   12   3   40.2     1/22
Xavier Nady         RF   218   .258   .318   .480    2   1    3.9    11/19

*  asterisks denote left-handed batters
#  pound signs denote switch-hitters
rankings are based on VORP for players with at least 100 PA

Wright, Reyes and Beltran are all going to the All Star game and deservedly so. Beltran and Reyes are the class of the league at their respective positions, and Wright trails only Florida’s Miguel Cabrera in VORP among NL third basemen. Jose Valentin has been far better than expected at second base given roughly half the plate appearances of an average regular. Floyd and Nady have both missed a chunk of time due to injury, though neither was consistently impressive when healthy. For all of his intangibles, Paul Lo Duca has only been better than roughly half of the NL catchers at the plate. I’m not sure that’s the definition of an All Star, but he’s going nonetheless.

WPA Top Two
David Wright, 247.9% WPA
Carlos Beltran, 218.2% WPA

WPA Bottom Two
Kazuo Matsui, -191.4% WPA
Cliff Floyd, -71.4% WPA

Bullpen

                     ERA     IP    H/9    SO/9   BB/9   HR/9   VORP
Billy Wagner        2.39    37.2   5.97  11.47   4.06   0.72   12.4
Duaner Sanchez      2.68    43.2   7.01   6.60   4.12   0.62   13.5
Aaron Heilman       4.40    45.0   8.80   7.60   3.20   0.80    6.4
Chad Bradford       2.43    29.2   6.98   7.28   1.82   0.30   12.0
Pedro Feliciano     1.74    31.0   6.97   8.13   2.03   0.29   14.0
Heath Bell          3.68    22.0  12.68   7.77   3.68   1.23    1.9
Darren Oliver       2.45    44.0   6.55   6.34   2.66   1.02   16.8

Heath Bell continues to have astronomical hit rates despite otherwise solid peripherals. His walk rate is up this year, though he has generally been decent in limited action. Darren Oliver has been a godsend in long relief and is scheduled to start tonight’s game against the Pirates. Both Sanchez and Heilman were lights out to begin the season but have since hit rough stretches. Billy Wagner has outstanding peripheral stats, except of course for his walk rate which is terrible. Not shown in the chart above are blown saves or FAP (Fan Agony Percentage), neither of which would be in Wagner’s favor.

WPA Top Two
Duaner Sanchez, 190.8% WPA
Billy Wagner, 158.9% WPA

WPA Bottom Two
Jorge Julio, -47.2% WPA
Pedro Feliciano, -23.2% WPA

Bench

                    Pos   PA    AVG    OBP    SLG  SB  CS   VORP
Chris Woodward      IF   101   .233   .316   .326   1   1  (-1.4)
Eli Marrero         UT    20   .294   .368   .706   2   0    2.9
Endy Chavez*        OF   178   .275   .316   .400   6   0    2.1
Julio Franco        1B    83   .299   .349   .442   4   0    4.1
Ramon Castro        C    107   .258   .340   .409   0   0    2.2 

Not much to complain about here, though Woodward has been a little disappointing. Marrero has hit well with the Mets, and Endy Chavez might be my favorite player on this team. Franco has been solid as a pinch hitter and mentor, and Ramon Castro is good enough to start for a number of teams.

Manager

Willie Randolph loves Subway sandwiches and is in his second full season as manager of the Mets. Here are some of his tendencies:

                        # Times    NL Rank
Pinch Hit                  107      15/16
Stolen Base Attempts       104       1/16
Sacrifice Bunts             48       2/16

Key Injuries

Brian Bannister

Payroll

Team Payroll   MLB Rank
$100,901,085     5/30

———-
References
———-
WPA (Win Probability Added) courtesy of FanGraphs.com
Manager tendencies and payroll information courtesy of ESPN.com
All other stats courtesy of Baseball Prospectus


27 Responses to “Mets By The Numbers”

  1. Comment posted by chris in ga on July 3, 2006 at 1:16 pm (#55143)

    I like to look @ the Vorp every monday so thanks for saving me sometime.

  2. Comment posted by anonymous on July 3, 2006 at 2:12 pm (#55146)

    This is a great comparison piece to hold up alongside the opposition (as detailed at Amazin’ Avenue). To me the big surprise here — though I ought to know it already — is the excellent performance of the Met bullpen, with almost every member having a double-digit positive VORP. They really are much better than Met fans generally think.

    Off-topic: Do you all do browser testing? This page layout looks terrible in Safari, with the stats trailing out of the column to the right and under the right-hand column, and the comments in a ridiculously huge font. Time for a web geek to join the Mets geeks?

  3. Gravatar
  4. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 3, 2006 at 2:23 pm (#55147)

    Off-topic: Do you all do browser testing? This page layout looks terrible in Safari, with the stats trailing out of the column to the right and under the right-hand column, and the comments in a ridiculously huge font. Time for a web geek to join the Mets geeks?

    The site looks fine in Mozilla and IE, which account for roughly 96% of the browser market share. Customizing a website to appear correctly on every single computer screen in the world is a daunting task. This site is generally coded within the W3C guidelines, and if it looks strange on Safari I would guess it’s something with the browser.

    It’s not that I don’t care how it looks in Safari, but I don’t own a Mac and have no means to test the appearance of MG on Safari; I thought Macs had a “fix all” button that would make annoyances like this go away? ;-)

    If someone would like to sponsor Mac testing of the site’s layout feel free to e-mail me and I will provide an address for you to send a Mac.

    Incidentally, are there any problems viewing the site in Firefox for OSX?

  5. Comment posted by Tim in LA on July 3, 2006 at 2:49 pm (#55150)

    Great info, and even moreso your posts on the opposition — I’m bookmarking your blog.

    That said, I think this quote contradicts the numbers you’ve posted:

    Trachsel has been passably effective, and Hernandez and Soler, apart from the occasional gem, have been erratic at best and abysmal at worst.

    If you pro-rate El Duque’s stats to match Trachsel’s innings, El Duque wins in VORP. Except for HR/9, all of El Duque’s peripherals are better. Both have had consistency problems, good starts and bad — they’ve basically been the same guy, with a slight nod to El Duque. I think you’ve got to clump them together, and say Soler is crap, but it’s not fair to put El Duque in that category. Plus he’s not boring as hell to watch…

  6. Comment posted by Rndng3rd on July 3, 2006 at 2:51 pm (#55151)

    Pedro Feliciano is in the bottom two for Mets relievers? That can’t be right.

  7. Comment posted by matt on July 3, 2006 at 2:54 pm (#55152)

    I’m looking at this page on Safari, and it looks fine to me…

  8. Comment posted by Brian on July 3, 2006 at 2:55 pm (#55153)

    FAP (Fan Agony Percentage)

    Is this a real stat? How is it figured?

  9. Comment posted by Ed in Westchester on July 3, 2006 at 3:00 pm (#55154)

    FAP (Fan Agony Percentage)

    Is this a real stat? How is it figured?

    Simple, how much does seing the guy come into a close game make you want to throw up :)

    I have taken the plunge my fellow geeks and started a blog. I will not pretend to be able to do as good a job as the guys who run MetsGeek, but I wil give it my best. For those who care to take a look:
    Ed’s Blue and Orange Cafe

  10. Gravatar
  11. Comment posted by pj on July 3, 2006 at 3:10 pm (#55155)

    The site looks fine in Mozilla and IE, which account for roughly 96% of the browser market share.

    not true! the tables bleed over in firefox (on my laptop anyway). it is much better if you make the window full size, but sadly the vorp numbers disappear into the advertisement sidebar.

    it always looks good on AA! keep up the good work ES.

  12. Comment posted by Victor Zambrano on July 3, 2006 at 3:11 pm (#55156)

    WPA Bottom Two
    Jose Lima, -77.0% WPA
    Jeremi Gonzalez, -23.3% WPA

    How do you like me now, Geeks?

  13. Comment posted by Eli on July 3, 2006 at 3:13 pm (#55157)

    I am viewing this through Safari (on a Mac) and everything is in place and looks good

    But viewing this, Trachsel doesn’t look very good. With more than ten hits per nine innings, the low numbers of k’s and the high numbers of bb’s, its amazing that he has done as good (=mediocre) as he has.

    Mets starting pitching needs help and I hope it comes from within. I have stated numerous times that I’d like to see Heilman in the rotation. What’s Bannister’s story? Is he throwing rehab games?

    Does Pelfrey stand a resonable chance of further developing his other pitches with the Mets during bullpen tune-ups or is the only real way in the minors experimenting against live pitching?

  14. Comment posted by chris in ga on July 3, 2006 at 3:15 pm (#55158)

    Yanks signed a bonus baby for 2.2 million dollars named Jesus Montero, a catcher from Venezuela. From BA.com

    “He has above-average raw power, a lot of power, but where do you put him?” the scout said. “I don’t think he’ll catch. He’s a big-hipped kid and he’s going to get bigger; he may have to end up at first base.”

  15. Comment posted by Ed in Westchester on July 3, 2006 at 3:21 pm (#55162)

    What is this safari you all talk about. The only one I know is at Disney :)

    FWIW, I have no prblems, but I use IE. I have no idea how to use anything else.

    Cy Trachsel is not very good. He is a #5, a #4 on a bad day for the rotation. We need a #3, or a #2 that allows Glavine to be #3.
    Of course, it is easy to ask for, but much harder to get.
    Frankly, I do not see Heilman as a #3, maybe a #4. The problem is, he needs to be stretched. Last night might have been a good chance to do it if he was available.
    Might be a good idea to do it tonight if Oliver only can go 4.
    Crap, they are all but conceding tonights game. I like Oliver out of the pen just fine, but as a starter, not so much.
    I kow, Maholm is not great, but with the way this team is playing, he may pull a Joe Mays on them.

  16. Gravatar
  17. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 3, 2006 at 3:21 pm (#55163)

    Pedro Feliciano is in the bottom two for Mets relievers? That can’t be right.

    That’s for WPA, which doesn’t necessary correlate with overall production. It’s a somewhat useful measure of “clutch”, which apparently Feliciano hasn’t been very.

  18. Gravatar
  19. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 3, 2006 at 3:23 pm (#55164)

    not true! the tables bleed over in firefox (on my laptop anyway). it is much better if you make the window full size, but sadly the vorp numbers disappear into the advertisement sidebar.

    Get a bigger monitor, mate! Would you prefer the tables wrap? 1024×768 should be plenty large to show everything on this post. If it doesn’t, my apologies.

  20. Gravatar
  21. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 3, 2006 at 3:24 pm (#55165)

    If you pro-rate El Duque’s stats to match Trachsel’s innings, El Duque wins in VORP. Except for HR/9, all of El Duque’s peripherals are better. Both have had consistency problems, good starts and bad — they’ve basically been the same guy, with a slight nod to El Duque. I think you’ve got to clump them together, and say Soler is crap, but it’s not fair to put El Duque in that category. Plus he’s not boring as hell to watch…

    Hard to argue with this; I’ve never been a fan of Trachsel’s.

  22. Comment posted by anonymous on July 3, 2006 at 4:22 pm (#55167)

    Off-topic on the formatting again: I can’t tell how to fix the stat tables (though I think they should wrap if the window’s too narrow), as the formatting code is a bit obscure here, but it looks like the “huge comments” issue might well be caused by an open h2 tag (id=”comments”, mistakenly closed as an h3) right above the comments. Closing that tag fixes the comment typesetting for me.

    How things look in Safari should be relatively similar to Konqueror’s rendering, since they’re based on the same core technology — that might be a way to do more design testing without getting a Mac.

  23. Comment posted by Brian on July 3, 2006 at 4:56 pm (#55171)

    Ed, in answer to you r question (in your blog)

    r sacrificed some chickens, who knows

    The Mets are now worshipping Jobu in hopes they can hit Curveballs and mediocre pitchers, young and old. It worked for the greatest president Holllywood has ever given us.

  24. Comment posted by udamnwright on July 3, 2006 at 5:34 pm (#55173)

    Great post Eric I enjoy this work up on the competition on AA and it was cool to see it on the Mets.

    While on Daily News live Adam Rubin just that Soler has a calf injury John Maine will be getting a start, and Pelfrey will probably get a start this week.

  25. Gravatar
  26. Comment posted by Wdwrkr35 on July 3, 2006 at 5:50 pm (#55174)

    Soler has been sent down and Main has been called up to pitch tonight.

    http://newyork.mets.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/news/probable_pitchers.jsp?c_id=nym

  27. Comment posted by kc on July 3, 2006 at 5:52 pm (#55175)

    Soler has been sent down and Main has been called up to pitch tonight.

    Then why not use Oliver last night before it got completely out of hand?

  28. Gravatar
  29. Comment posted by Wdwrkr35 on July 3, 2006 at 5:57 pm (#55176)

    I guess they hadnt figured on Maine being called up last night. In the article about Wille says he doesnt expect Oliver to be able to pitch more the 50-60 pitches in a game as the reason hes not starting today

  30. Gravatar
  31. Comment posted by Wdwrkr35 on July 3, 2006 at 6:01 pm (#55177)

    I just hope Maine does better then his last start for the mets 5.1 ip , 4 er, 2bb, 0 k

    Im assuming he did that bad because of his finger problem. I for one will be rootin for him. Anyone hear whats going on with Bannister?

  32. Comment posted by chris in ga on July 3, 2006 at 6:06 pm (#55178)

    I’m rooting for Maine to do well.

  33. Gravatar
  34. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 3, 2006 at 6:08 pm (#55179)

    Off-topic on the formatting again: I can’t tell how to fix the stat tables (though I think they should wrap if the window’s too narrow), as the formatting code is a bit obscure here, but it looks like the “huge comments” issue might well be caused by an open h2 tag (id=”comments”, mistakenly closed as an h3) right above the comments. Closing that tag fixes the comment typesetting for me.

    Nice catch. That h2/h3 bug has probably been in the code forever; I’ve fixed that, so hopefully it will resolve the comments issue you are having. The stats tables are a different animal; since they’re contained in [pre][/pre] blocks they are treated by browsers as single, unbreakable strings of text, almost as an image is treated. Maybe cutting down on spaces in between columns would help. What is your resolution and how far do the comments shoot out the side?

  35. Comment posted by anonymous on July 3, 2006 at 6:31 pm (#55186)

    Thanks — the comments are looking good now.

    What is your resolution and how far do the comments shoot out the side?

    In a browser window around 800-850 pixels wide, with a default font at 14pt (this affects how Safari renders font sizes specified in CSS), about half the preformatted stats here are out of the column — say around the beginning of the H/9 column in the starting rotation stats. It takes a browser window roughly 1100-1200 pixels wide to get the VORP column for the starting rotation to be visible rather than hidden by ads. Might be helped by some massaging of the pre tag in your CSS stylesheet, but this is much nicer already with the readable comments.

  36. Gravatar
  37. Comment posted by Eric Simon on July 7, 2006 at 11:05 pm (#57031)

    Not that anybody is reading this thread anymore, but I put some code in place to auto-wrap pre-formatted stats. Wrapping makes the tables difficult to read, but I feel it’s preferable to having the table kick out the right side of the middle frame into the sidebar.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

advertisement:

advertisement:

-->

rss/syndication:

your ad here:

advertisement: